Sciullo, AlessandroGilcrease, Gregory WinstonPerugini, MarioPadovan, DarioCurli, BarbaraGregg, Jay SterlingArrobbio, OsmanMeynaerts, ErikaDelvaux, SarahPolo-Alvarez, LuciaCandelise, Chiaravan der Waal, Esthervan der Windt, HennyHubert, WitIvask, NeleMuiste, Marek2022-02-21Sciullo , A , Gilcrease , G W , Perugini , M , Padovan , D , Curli , B , Gregg , J S , Arrobbio , O , Meynaerts , E , Delvaux , S , Polo-Alvarez , L , Candelise , C , van der Waal , E , van der Windt , H , Hubert , W , Ivask , N & Muiste , M 2022 , ' Exploring Institutional and Socio-Economic Settings for the Development of Energy Communities in Europe ' , Energies , vol. 15 , no. 4 , 1597 , pp. 1597 . https://doi.org/10.3390/en150415971996-1073researchoutputwizard: 11556/1285Publisher Copyright: © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.Energy communities (ECs), intended as collective action initiatives in the energy field involving citizens’ participation, have been gaining relevance for the past decades as an alternative way to organize the energy chain to challenge the incumbent system. With Europe’s recently adopted Clean Energy Package, ECs found a formal recognition by the European Union as potential actors of the transition of the energy system towards a wider and more decentralized use of renewable sources. Although the potential role of ECs in the transition is therefore hardly questionable, a thorough comprehension of the enabling factors that might foster their diffusion and scaling up is still lacking. Through a comparative analysis of the evolutionary trajectories in six EU countries regarding their energy systems, their regulatory frameworks and their historical evolution of ECs, namely through the example of cooperative models, this paper aims at providing some preliminary evidence about the factors and dynamics that seem to have played, and may play, a role in hampering or facilitating EC model diffusion. Attention is therefore specifically paid to three dimensions of analysis referring to: the energy mix and market structure; the institutional and policy landscape; the wider social attitudes towards environmental issues and cooperation among citizens. In addition to providing a wide comparison of different EU countries, the paper shows that the historical evolution pathways have to be carefully taken into account to understand what might trigger ECs exploitation in the EU.11135149enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessjournal article10.3390/en15041597Energy communitiesRenewable energy sourcesRegulatory frameworkEnergy systemsComparative analysisEnergy transitionEnergy communitiesRenewable energy sourcesRegulatory frameworkEnergy systemsComparative analysisEnergy transitionRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the EnvironmentFuel TechnologyEnergy Engineering and Power TechnologyEnergy (miscellaneous)Control and OptimizationElectrical and Electronic EngineeringSDG 7 - Affordable and Clean EnergySDG 13 - Climate ActionSDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong InstitutionsProject IDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/837722/EU/Collective Action Models for Energy Transition and Social Innovation/COMETSinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/837722/EU/Collective Action Models for Energy Transition and Social Innovation/COMETSFunding InfoThis research has received funding from the H2020 project COMETS—Collective Action Models for Energy Transition and Social Innovation (GA 837722)This research has received funding from the H2020 project COMETS—Collective Action Models for Energy Transition and Social Innovation (GA 837722)http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125202091&partnerID=8YFLogxK