Silvoni, StefanoRamos-Murguialday, AnderCavinato, MariannaVolpato, ChiaraCisotto, GiuliaTurolla, AndreaPiccione, FrancescoBirbaumer, Niels2024-07-242024-07-242011-10Silvoni , S , Ramos-Murguialday , A , Cavinato , M , Volpato , C , Cisotto , G , Turolla , A , Piccione , F & Birbaumer , N 2011 , ' Brain-computer interface in stroke : A review of progress ' , Clinical EEG and Neuroscience , vol. 42 , no. 4 , pp. 245-252 . https://doi.org/10.1177/1550059411042004101550-0594https://hdl.handle.net/11556/3760Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology has been used for rehabilitation after stroke and there are a number of reports involving stroke patients in BCI-feedback training. Most publications have demonstrated the efficacy of BCI technology in post-stroke rehabilitation using output devices such as Functional Electrical Stimulation, robot, and orthosis. The aim of this review is to focus on the progress of BCI-based rehabilitation strategies and to underline future challenges. A brief history of clinical BCI-approaches is presented focusing on stroke motor rehabilitation. A context for three approaches of a BCI-based motor rehabilitation program is outlined: the substitutive strategy, classical conditioning and operant conditioning. Furthermore, we include an overview of a pilot study concerning a new neuro-forcefeedback strategy. This pilot study involved healthy participants. Finally we address some challenges for future BCI-based rehabilitation.8enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessBrain-computer interface in stroke: A review of progressjournal article10.1177/155005941104200410Brain-computer interfaceBrain-machine interfaceNeuro-forcefeedbackNeuroplasticityProgressStrokeNeurologyNeurology (clinical)SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beinghttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=83355174119&partnerID=8YFLogxK