Performance Assessment of Three Turbulence Models Validated through an Experimental Wave Flume under Different Scenarios of Wave Generation

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Identifiers
Publication date
2020-11-05
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
Citations
Google Scholar
Export
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
This study aimed to adjust the turbulence models to the real behavior of the numerical wave flume (NWF) and the future research that will be carried out on it, according to the turbulence model that best adjusts to each particular case study. The k-", k-! and large-eddy simulation (LES) models, using the volume of fluid (VOF) method, were analyzed and compared respectively. The wavemaker theory was followed to faithfully reproduce the waves, which were measured in an experimental wave flume (EWF) and compared with the theory to validate each turbulence model. Besides, reflection was measured with the Mansard and Funke method, which has shown promising results when studying one of the most critical turbulent behaviors in the wave flume, called the breaking of the waves. The free surface displacement obtained with each turbulence model was compared with the recorded signals located at three points of the experimental wave flume, in the time domain of each run, respectively. Finally, the calculated reflection coefficients and the amplitudes of the reflected waves were compared, aiming to have a better understanding of the wave reflection process at the extinction zone. The research showed good agreement between all the experimental signals and the numerical outcomes for all the turbulence models analyzed.
Description
Citation
Galera-Calero, Lander, Jesús María Blanco, Urko Izquierdo, and Gustavo Adolfo Esteban. “Performance Assessment of Three Turbulence Models Validated through an Experimental Wave Flume Under Different Scenarios of Wave Generation.” Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 8, no. 11 (November 5, 2020): 881. doi:10.3390/jmse8110881.