How are cities planning to respond to climate change? Assessment of local climate plans from 885 cities in the EU-28

Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
The Paris Agreement aims to limit global mean temperature rise this century to well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels. This target has wide-ranging implications for Europe and its cities, which are the source of substantial greenhouse gas emissions. This paper reports the state of local planning for climate change by collecting and analysing information about local climate mitigation and adaptation plans across 885 urban areas of the EU-28. A typology and framework for analysis was developed that classifies local climate plans in terms of their alignment with spatial (local, national and international) and other climate related policies. Out of eight types of local climate plans identified in total we document three types of stand-alone local climate plans classified as type A1 (autonomously produced plans), A2 (plans produced to comply with national regulations) or A3 (plans developed for international climate networks). There is wide variation among countries in the prevalence of local climate plans, with generally more plans developed by central and northern European cities. Approximately 66% of EU cities have a type A1, A2, or A3 mitigation plan, 26% an adaptation plan, and 17% a joint adaptation and mitigation plan, while about 33% lack any form of stand-alone local climate plan (i.e. what we classify as A1, A2, A3 plans). Mitigation plans are more numerous than adaptation plans, but planning for mitigation does not always precede planning for adaptation. Our analysis reveals that city size, national legislation, and international networks can influence the development of local climate plans. We found that size does matter as about 80% of the cities with above 500,000 inhabitants have a comprehensive and stand-alone mitigation and/or an adaptation plan (A1). Cities in four countries with national climate legislation (A2), i.e. Denmark, France, Slovakia and the United Kingdom, are nearly twice as likely to produce local mitigation plans, and five times more likely to produce local adaptation plans, compared to cities in countries without such legislation. A1 and A2 mitigation plans are particularly numerous in Denmark, Poland, Germany, and Finland; while A1 and A2 adaptation plans are prevalent in Denmark, Finland, UK and France. The integration of adaptation and mitigation is country-specific and can mainly be observed in two countries where local climate plans are compulsory, i.e. France and the UK. Finally, local climate plans produced for international climate networks (A3) are mostly found in the many countries where autonomous (type A1) plans are less common. This is the most comprehensive analysis of local climate planning to date. The findings are of international importance as they will inform and support decision-making towards climate planning and policy development at national, EU and global level being based on the most comprehensive and up-to-date knowledge of local climate planning available to date.
Description
Publisher Copyright: © 2018 The Authors
Keywords
Climate change , Paris agreement , Local climate plans , Cities , Urban areas , Urban audit cities , Europe , Adaptation , Mitigation , Seap/Secap , Climate change , Paris agreement , Local climate plans , Cities , Urban areas , Urban audit cities , Europe , Adaptation , Mitigation , Seap/Secap , Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment , Building and Construction , General Environmental Science , Strategy and Management , Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering , SDG 13 - Climate Action , SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure , SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities , Project ID , info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/308497/EU/Reconciling Adaptation, Mitigation and Sustainable Development for Cities/RAMSES , info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/308497/EU/Reconciling Adaptation, Mitigation and Sustainable Development for Cities/RAMSES , Funding Info , EU COST Action TU0902 that made the initial work possible and the positive_x000D_ engagement and interaction of the members of this group which led to this work. MO_x000D_ acknowledges funding from the Spanish Government (Grant no. FPDI-2013-16631)._x000D_ EKL was supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of CR within the_x000D_ National Sustainability Program I (NPU I), grant number LO1415. OH and RD were_x000D_ funded by the EC project RAMSES Reconciling Adaptation, Mitigation and Sustainable_x000D_ Development for Cities (contract Ref 308497) and the EPSRC project LC Transforms:_x000D_ Low Carbon Transitions of Fleet Operations in Metropolitan Sites Project_x000D_ (EP/N010612/1). , EU COST Action TU0902 that made the initial work possible and the positive_x000D_ engagement and interaction of the members of this group which led to this work. MO_x000D_ acknowledges funding from the Spanish Government (Grant no. FPDI-2013-16631)._x000D_ EKL was supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of CR within the_x000D_ National Sustainability Program I (NPU I), grant number LO1415. OH and RD were_x000D_ funded by the EC project RAMSES Reconciling Adaptation, Mitigation and Sustainable_x000D_ Development for Cities (contract Ref 308497) and the EPSRC project LC Transforms:_x000D_ Low Carbon Transitions of Fleet Operations in Metropolitan Sites Project_x000D_ (EP/N010612/1).
Citation
Reckien , D , Salvia , M , Heidrich , O , Church , J M , Pietrapertosa , F , De Gregorio-Hurtado , S , D'Alonzo , V , Foley , A , Simoes , S G , Krkoška Lorencová , E , Orru , H , Orru , K , Wejs , A , Flacke , J , Olazabal , M , Geneletti , D , Feliu , E , Vasilie , S , Nador , C , Krook-Riekkola , A , Matosović , M , Fokaides , P A , Ioannou , B I , Flamos , A , Spyridaki , N-A , Balzan , M V , Fülöp , O , Paspaldzhiev , I , Grafakos , S & Dawson , R 2018 , ' How are cities planning to respond to climate change? Assessment of local climate plans from 885 cities in the EU-28 ' , Journal of Cleaner Production , vol. 191 , pp. 207-219 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.220