A performance comparison of position-based routing approaches for mobile ad hoc networks

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorDe La Fuente, Miguel Garcia
dc.contributor.authorLadiod, Houda
dc.contributor.institutionCentros PRE-FUSION TECNALIA - (FORMER)
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-24T11:46:34Z
dc.date.available2024-07-24T11:46:34Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.description.abstractIn this work we present a performance comparison study between SIFT (Simple Forwarding over Trajectory), an innovative and scalable trajectory-based approach, and DREAM (Distance Routing Effect Algorithm for Mobility), a stable, largely tested position-based scheme. In the literature, the latest studies indicate that control overhead is the most important drawback that routing protocols must face. Classical ad hoc routing schemes do not perform well in MANETS (Mobile Ad hoc Networks) because they were not designed to handle efficiently mobility handicaps. Position-based forwarding techniques perform better in highly dynamic scenarios, reducing control overhead consequences, but there may be some highly dynamic scenarios where they do not perform efficiently. Trajectory-based forwarding protocols solve the overhead problem and, thus, they perform efficiently in MANETS. Our study demonstrates that SIFT performs better than DREAM concerning delivery ratio, control overhead and route length in terms of number of hops. Its main handicap could be, a priori, the delivery delay. However, even if delay may be high in SIFT, control overhead may also causes even higher delivery delay in DREAM.en
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.format.extent5
dc.identifier.citationDe La Fuente , M G & Ladiod , H 2007 , A performance comparison of position-based routing approaches for mobile ad hoc networks . in 2007 IEEE 66th Vehicular Technology Conference, VTC 2007-Fall . , 4349666 , IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference , pp. 1-5 , 2007 IEEE 66th Vehicular Technology Conference, VTC 2007-Fall , Baltimore, MD , United States , 30/09/07 . https://doi.org/10.1109/VETECF.2007.17
dc.identifier.citationconference
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/VETECF.2007.17
dc.identifier.isbn1424402646
dc.identifier.isbn9781424402649
dc.identifier.issn1550-2252
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11556/1574
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=47649091103&partnerID=8YFLogxK
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartof2007 IEEE 66th Vehicular Technology Conference, VTC 2007-Fall
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIEEE Vehicular Technology Conference
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subject.keywordsGeographical routing
dc.subject.keywordsMobile ad hoc networks
dc.subject.keywordsPerformance comparison
dc.subject.keywordsPosition-based routing
dc.subject.keywordsRouting
dc.subject.keywordsTrajectory-based forwarding
dc.subject.keywordsComputer Science Applications
dc.subject.keywordsElectrical and Electronic Engineering
dc.subject.keywordsApplied Mathematics
dc.titleA performance comparison of position-based routing approaches for mobile ad hoc networksen
dc.typeconference output
Files