Comparing different approaches for design of experiments (DoE)

No Thumbnail Available
Identifiers
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/11556/2242
ISSN: 1876-1100
ISBN: 9789048123100
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-2311-7_52
Publication date
2009
Authors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Citations
Google Scholar
Export
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
Design of Experiments (DoE) is a methodology for systematically applying statistics to experimentation. Since experimentation is a frequent activity at industries, most engineers (and scientists) end up using statistics to analyse their experiments, regardless of their background. OFAT (one-factor-at-a-time) is an old-fashioned strategy, usually taught at universities and still widely practiced by companies. The statistical approaches to DoE (Classical, Shainin and Taguchi) are far superior to OFAT. The aforementioned approaches have their proponents and opponents, and the debate between them is known to become heated at times. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to present each approach along with its limitations.
Description
Keywords
Classical , Design of Experiments , Shainin , Statistical approach , Taguchi , Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Type
conference output
Citation
Tanco , M , Viles , E & Pozueta , L 2009 , Comparing different approaches for design of experiments (DoE) . in Advances in Electrical Engineering and Computational Science . Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering , vol. 39 LNEE , pp. 611-621 . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2311-7_52