Comparison of dry and liquid carbon dioxide cutting conditions based on machining performance and life cycle assessment for end milling GFRP

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKhanna, Navneet
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez, Adrián
dc.contributor.authorShah, Prassan
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Octavio
dc.contributor.authorRubio-Mateos, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorde Lacalle, Luis Norberto López
dc.contributor.authorOstra, Txomin
dc.contributor.institutionFABRIC_INTEL
dc.date.issued2022-09
dc.descriptionPublisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s).
dc.description.abstractIn the present scenario, citizens’ concern about environment preservation creates a necessity to mature more ecological and energy-efficient manufacturing processes and materials. The usage of glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) is one of the emerging materials to replace the traditional metallic alloys in the automotive and aircraft industries. However, it has been comprehended to arise a sustainable substitute to conventional emulsion-based coolants in machining processes for dropping the destructive effects on the ecosystem without degrading the machining performance. So, in this study, the comparison of the two sustainable cutting fluid approaches, i.e., dry and LCO2, has been presented based on machining performance indicators like temperature, modulus of cutting force, tool wear, surface roughness, power consumption, and life cycle assessment (LCA) analysis for end milling of GFRP. The cutting condition of LCO2 has been found to be superior in terms of machining performance by providing 80% of lower cutting zone temperature, tool wear, 5% lower modulus of cutting force, and reduced surface roughness with 9% lower power consumption that has been observed in the case of LCO2 in comparison with dry machining. However, to compress the CO2 for converting in liquid form, a higher amount of energy and natural resources is consumed resulting in a higher impact on the environment in comparison with dry machining. Considering the 18 impact categories of ReCiPe midpoint (H) 2016, 95% higher values of impacts have been observed in the case of LCO2 in comparison with dry machining.en
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. The authors received financial support from Basque Government in the Excellence University Group system call, grant IT 1573–22. The executed work is as per the MOU signed between the Advanced Manufacturing Laboratory (IITRAM, India) and the Advanced Manufacturing Research Group (UPV/EHU, Bilbao, Spain). Thanks are due to Spanish Project Ministerio de Ciencia e innovation PDC2021-121792-I00 (DPI2016-74845-R) because of some result analysis and to project, and to former one PID2019-109340RB-I00 Iteneo for the help in CO2 device development and optimization.
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.format.extent13
dc.identifier.citationKhanna , N , Rodríguez , A , Shah , P , Pereira , O , Rubio-Mateos , A , de Lacalle , L N L & Ostra , T 2022 , ' Comparison of dry and liquid carbon dioxide cutting conditions based on machining performance and life cycle assessment for end milling GFRP ' , International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology , vol. 122 , no. 2 , pp. 821-833 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09843-4
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00170-022-09843-4
dc.identifier.issn0268-3768
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136961531&partnerID=8YFLogxK
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
dc.relation.projectIDAdvanced Manufacturing Research Group
dc.relation.projectIDEusko Jaurlaritza, IT 1573–22
dc.relation.projectIDEuskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, EHU
dc.relation.projectIDMinistry of Unification, MOU
dc.relation.projectIDMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación, MICINN, PDC2021-121792-I00-DPI2016-74845-R
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.keywordsEnd milling
dc.subject.keywordsGFRP
dc.subject.keywordsLife cycle assessment
dc.subject.keywordsLiquid carbon dioxide
dc.subject.keywordsMachinability indicators
dc.subject.keywordsControl and Systems Engineering
dc.subject.keywordsSoftware
dc.subject.keywordsMechanical Engineering
dc.subject.keywordsComputer Science Applications
dc.subject.keywordsIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering
dc.subject.keywordsSDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
dc.subject.keywordsSDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
dc.subject.keywordsSDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
dc.titleComparison of dry and liquid carbon dioxide cutting conditions based on machining performance and life cycle assessment for end milling GFRPen
dc.typejournal article
Files