Browsing by Keyword "Motor imagery"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item EEG-based BCI for the linear control of an upper-limb neuroprosthesis(2016-11-01) Vidaurre, Carmen; Klauer, Christian; Schauer, Thomas; Ramos-Murguialday, Ander; Müller, Klaus Robert; Medical TechnologiesAssistive technologies help patients to reacquire interacting capabilities with the environment and improve their quality of life. In this manuscript we present a feasibility study in which healthy users were able to use a non-invasive Motor Imagery (MI)-based brain computer interface (BCI) to achieve linear control of an upper-limb functional electrical stimulation (FES) controlled neuro-prosthesis. The linear control allowed the real-time computation of a continuous control signal that was used by the FES system to physically set the stimulation parameters to control the upper-limb position. Even if the nature of the task makes the operation very challenging, the participants achieved a mean selection accuracy of 82.5% in a target selection experiment. An analysis of limb kinematics as well as the positioning precision was performed, showing the viability of using a BCI–FES system to control upper-limb reaching movements. The results of this study constitute an accurate use of an online non-invasive BCI to operate a FES-neuroprosthesis setting a step toward the recovery of the control of an impaired limb with the sole use of brain activity.Item Neuromuscular electrical stimulation induced brain patterns to decode motor imagery(2013-09) Vidaurre, C.; Pascual, J.; Ramos-Murguialday, A.; Lorenz, R.; Blankertz, B.; Birbaumer, N.; Müller, K. R.; Medical TechnologiesObjective: Regardless of the paradigm used to implement a brain-computer interface (BCI), all systems suffer from BCI-inefficiency. In the case of patients the inefficiency can be high. Some solutions have been proposed to overcome this problem, however they have not been completely successful yet. Methods: EEG from 10 healthy users was recorded during neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) of hands and feet and during motor imagery (MI) of the same limbs. Features and classifiers were computed using part of these data to decode MI. Results: Offline analyses showed that it was possible to decode MI using a classifier based on afferent patterns induced by NMES and even infer a better model than with MI data. Conclusion: Afferent NMES motor patterns can support the calibration of BCI systems and be used to decode MI. Significance: This finding might be a new way to train sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) based BCI systems for healthy users having difficulties to attain BCI control. It might also be an alternative to train MI-based BCIs for users who cannot perform real movements but have remaining afferents (ALS, stroke patients).