dc.contributor.author | Martin, H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bramberger, R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Schmittner, C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ma, Z. | |
dc.contributor.author | Gruber, T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ruiz, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Macher, G. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-12-11T16:16:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-12-11T16:16:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Martin H. et al. (2017) Safety and Security Co-engineering and Argumentation Framework. In: Tonetta S., Schoitsch E., Bitsch F. (eds) Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10489. Springer, Cham | en |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-3-319-66283-1 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0302-9743 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11556/825 | |
dc.description.abstract | Automotive systems become increasingly complex due to their functional range and data exchange with the outside world. Until now, functional safety of such safety-critical electrical/electronic systems has been covered successfully. However, the data exchange requires interconnection across trusted boundaries of the vehicle. This leads to security issues like hacking and malicious attacks against interfaces, which could bring up new types of safety issues. Before mass-production of automotive systems, arguments supported by evidences are required regarding safety and security. Product engineering must be compliant to specific standards and must support arguments that the system is free of unreasonable risks.
This paper shows a safety and security co-engineering framework, which covers standard compliant process derivation and management, and supports product specific safety and security co-analysis. Furthermore, we investigate process- and product-related argumentation and apply the approach to an automotive use case regarding safety and security. | en |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work is supported by the projects EMC2 and AMASS. Research leading to these results has received funding from the EU ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking under grant agreement no. 621429 (project EMC2), project AMASS (H2020-ECSEL no 692474; Spain’s MINECO ref. PCIN-2015-262) and from the COMET K2 - Competence Centres for Excellent Technologies Programme of the Austrian Federal Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Technology (bmvit), the Austrian Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy (bmwfw), the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG), the Province of Styria and the Styrian Business Promotion Agency (SFG). | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.publisher | Springer, Cham | en |
dc.title | Safety and Security Co-engineering and Argumentation Framework | en |
dc.type | conference output | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/978-3-319-66284-8_24 | en |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/621429/EU/Embedded Multi-Core Systems for Mixed Criticality Applications in Dynamic and Changeable Real-Time Environments/EMC2 | en |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/692474/EU/Architecture-driven, Multi-concern and Seamless Assurance and Certification of Cyber-Physical Systems/AMASS | en |
dc.rights.accessRights | open access | en |
dc.subject.keywords | Safety and security co-engineering | en |
dc.subject.keywords | Process- and product-based argumentation | en |
dc.subject.keywords | Process and argumentation patterns | en |
dc.subject.keywords | Automotive domain | en |
dc.subject.keywords | ISO 26262 | en |
dc.subject.keywords | SAE J3061 | en |
dc.journal.title | Lecture Notes in Computer Science | en |
dc.page.final | 297 | en |
dc.page.initial | 286 | en |
dc.volume.number | 10489 | en |
dc.identifier.esbn | 978-3-319-66284-8 | en |
dc.conference.title | International Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security .SAFECOMP 2017: Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security | en |